EmailDiscussions.com  

Go Back   EmailDiscussions.com > Email Service Provider-specific Forums > FastMail Forum
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts
Stay in touch wirelessly

FastMail Forum All posts relating to FastMail.FM should go here: suggestions, comments, requests for help, complaints, technical issues etc.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 30 Sep 2003, 12:36 AM   #1
Jeremy Howard
Ultimate Contributor
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Australia
Posts: 11,501
Server2 outage

The new kernel on server2 is not performing as expected. Therefore we are rebooting the server to restore the previous kernel, until the performance problems are sorted out. There will be a 10 minute outage.
Jeremy Howard is offline   Reply With Quote

Old 30 Sep 2003, 12:42 AM   #2
Jeremy Howard
Ultimate Contributor
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Australia
Posts: 11,501
The reboot is now underway...
Jeremy Howard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 Sep 2003, 12:43 AM   #3
leisuresuitlary
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 168
i wondered which server my account was kept on.....

now i know!!!!

Larry
leisuresuitlary is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 Sep 2003, 12:49 AM   #4
Jeremy Howard
Ultimate Contributor
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Australia
Posts: 11,501
Reboot is now complete. Outage time was 5 minutes
Jeremy Howard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 Sep 2003, 12:54 AM   #5
elvey
The "e" in e-mail
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 2,466
Thanks for keeping us updated!!!
I was wondering why Mozilla was asking me for my password (which it normally stores) and this thread answered the question immediately.
elvey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 Sep 2003, 01:05 AM   #6
Jeremy Howard
Ultimate Contributor
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Australia
Posts: 11,501
We've got an idea how to resolve the performance problem. We'll wait until it is night-time in the US and UK, and then we'll need another reboot to install our updated kernel. We'll schedule this so everyone will know when it happens.

Sorry about this short outage today. We tested the new kernel carefully on the beta server, however we tested under IO load (which is normally the constraint) not CPU load. The new kernel turned out to have CPU performance problems. We'll do some CPU performance testing on the beta server tomorrow with alternate kernels.
Jeremy Howard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 Sep 2003, 03:49 AM   #7
elvey
The "e" in e-mail
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 2,466
Cool.

There was an article I sent to Rob a while back on I/O.
Also comments on the very fast code produced by the Intel C++ compiler for Linux I/O. Rob mentioned some of the nice hardware you're working with. Have you considered/tried this compiler?


short article: Mix 2 parts Hyper-Threading with 1 part PCI-X and you have an I/O accelerant that delivers 3,400 IOPS and 266MB of data per second! (SCSI)



Read what happens when openBench Labs ignores hobgoblin thinking, to examine a new class of hardware as we test the mettle of the 1U Appro 12224Xi server to handle large (make that huge) amounts of I/O, using Adaptec's 39320 series Ultra320 SCSI controller and four Maxtor 10K IV drives. Check out a recipe that mixes 2 parts Hyper-Threading with 1 part PCI-X for an I/O accelerant of gargantuan proportions.



http://www.open-mag.com/35773583279.htm
elvey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 Sep 2003, 05:12 AM   #8
Jeremy Howard
Ultimate Contributor
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Australia
Posts: 11,501
We use this to compile most stuff, but not the kernel - it needs too many patches to compile cleanly.
Jeremy Howard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 Oct 2003, 05:21 AM   #9
elvey
The "e" in e-mail
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 2,466
Quote:
Originally posted by Jeremy Howard
We use this to compile most stuff, but not the kernel - it needs too many patches to compile cleanly.
Thanks for the answer! Fair enough and interesting. I wonder which distributions come with kernels compiled with Intel's compiler. Of course it's in the kernel that the most impact would be felt.
elvey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 Oct 2003, 07:10 AM   #10
Jeremy Howard
Ultimate Contributor
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Australia
Posts: 11,501
Quote:
Originally posted by elvey
Of course it's in the kernel that the most impact would be felt.
Not for us - most of our CPU time is in Cyrus and mod_perl. System time is not that high.
Jeremy Howard is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +9. The time now is 02:34 PM.

 

Copyright EmailDiscussions.com 1998-2022. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy